[Sugar-devel] Gtk 3.10 icon size regression

Daniel Narvaez dwnarvaez at gmail.com
Mon Jan 20 05:16:09 EST 2014

On 20 January 2014 07:14, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 12:07:34PM +0100, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> > On 18 January 2014 11:32, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:41:57AM +0100, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> > > > By the way, XO is our main platform from the number of users
> > > > point of view but it seems like a dead end at this point. So IMO
> > > > it should not be our main target when designing future
> > > > solutions.
> > >
> > > Yes, but not for the reason you give.  The OLPC XO is still in
> > > production, and is still in deployment.  The best reason for not
> > > selecting the OLPC XO as your main target is so that Sugar can be
> > > suitable for as many platforms as possible.
> >
> > Are new XO being sold? My possibly misguided feeling is that OLPC is
> > not even trying anymore.
> I'm not in that part of OLPC, I'm in engineering and manufacturing
> support.  As far as I know, you can still order new XO laptops if you
> have a large enough quantity in mind.  Any organisations wishing to
> get a quote can write to countries at laptop.org.
> I may be misguided, but I didn't think Sugar Labs wants to buy any XO
> laptops.  ;-) I think developers have enough XO laptops to work on, or
> can share them around.

For the record what I was saying is that the XO is a dead end because OLPC
is not marketing it anymore, in favor of the Android tablet. As a result
I'd expect organizations to not be ordering it anymore.

Factual corrections appreciated, pointless sarcasm not so much. Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20140120/489ae738/attachment.html>

More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list