[Sugar-devel] Are we ready for code freeze?

[Gonzalo Odiard]

Yes. Only fixes allowed, we can discuss if double review is needed or not.

Gonzalo

On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
> To be clear, are you saying we should code freeze tomorrow? I couldn't find
> a definition of the freeze in the wiki but the GNOME one seems accurate.
>
> Hard Code Freeze
>
> This is a late freeze to avoids sudden last-minute accidents which could
> risk the stability that should have been reached at this point. No source
> code changes are allowed without two approvals from the release team, but
> translation and documentation should continue. Simple build fixes are, of
> course, allowed without asking.
>
> On 2 September 2013 20:29, Gonzalo Odiard <gonzalo at laptop.org> wrote:
>>
>> Release 0.99.3 as is is good, because we will have rpms and that
>> should facilitate testing.
>> I prefer we try hard to follow the schedule, remember usually is aligned
>> with Fedora and other projects.
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > 0.99.3 is due tomorrow and with it the code freeze. We need to decide
>> > what
>> > to do.
>> >
>> > I propose we don't freeze and instead we keep releasing 0.99.x every
>> > four
>> > weeks, until we feel we have done enough testing and bug fixing. This is
>> > not
>> > what you are supposed to do with time based releases but I'd rather
>> > delay
>> > than release something we can't be proud of.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Sugar-devel mailing list
>> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez