[Sugar-devel] 0.102 focus and features
Anish Mangal
anish at activitycentral.com
Thu Oct 31 22:00:04 EDT 2013
I may be incorrect, but I think the way it happened (during 0.88-94 days)
was a feature was first proposed on the mailing list with the [FEATURE] tag
in the subject line. It was then extensively discussed, and then at some
later point a wiki page was created, which was (supposed to be) useful at
the time of feature-freeze to make a go/no-go call for code-inclusion in
mainline, so having the current state summarized in a wiki page was useful.
(Just giving historical reference)
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:49 PM, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:18:42PM -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
> > Not sure there is too much more overhead for writing a wiki page vs
> > writing an email. I don't recall hearing anything concrete about the
> > feature proposal process recently. It has be refactored periodically,
> > usually under the guidance of the release manager :)
>
> Agreed, the overhead isn't much; only about double the time, but it is
> mostly borne by the feature proposer. The same template could be used
> in e-mail, and this would give a discussion thread view rather than a
> finished filled-in template view. As mostly a reader of the features,
> I'm okay with either, but the Wiki doesn't show much in the way of the
> discussion.
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.linux.org.au/
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131031/b81cbc05/attachment.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list