[Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again

[Gonzalo Odiard]

Was already pushed by manuq.

Gonzalo

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
> The patch looks fine to me. I'm not sure the all caps ATTENTION is necessary
> but if you want to keep it s/ATENTION/ATTENTION. And let's add the comment
> about gtk2 we discussed before. Feel free to push with these changes.
>
>
> On 30 October 2013 15:27, Gonzalo Odiard <gonzalo at laptop.org> wrote:
>>
>> Today I received this mail from Esteban Arias in Uruguay:
>>
>> "....
>> Cuando sugar cambió el toolbar, o cuando se pasó a gtk3, se mantuvo
>> compatibilidad hacia atrás.
>> Pero al pasar a sugar 0.98 varias de las actividades dejaron de funcionar
>> por tener service_name en lugar de bundle_id enel activity.info.
>> Existe alguno parche o alguna solución para evitar cambiar todos los
>> activity.info de las actividades?
>> ....
>> "
>> Translation:
>> "When sugar changed the toolbar, or when changed to gtk3, background
>> compatibility
>> was maintained. But with the change to 0.98 several activities stoped
>> working because
>> have service_name instead of bundle_id in activity.info.
>> There are a patch or fix to avoid change the activity.info file in every
>> activity?"
>>
>> Similar mails reporting errors in activities, and finally found the
>> problem is related to this
>> change are received regularly in support mailing lists as iaep or
>> support-gang.
>>
>> I wanted try what is needed change to make that activities work, and the
>> change is really small. Attached is a patch to sugar-toolkit-gtk3. From my
>> part I think we have broken
>> compatibility without a good reason in this case, and should be solved.
>>
>> What you think about include it  in Sugar?
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez