[Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again

[Tony Anderson]

HI,

I suspect a 10 line python script could update activity-info.

It may be time to have two versions of each activity in ASLO. One 
compatible
with 0.82 and the other with 0.100.

Keeping in mind that 0.82 < 0.100.

Tony


On 10/30/2013 05:04 PM, sugar-devel-request at lists.sugarlabs.org wrote:
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:03:58 +1100
> From: James Cameron<quozl at laptop.org>
> To:sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again
> Message-ID:<20131030210358.GD20759 at us.netrek.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:27:57PM -0200, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>> >What you think about include it ?in Sugar??
> Yes, include it.
>
> It has no effect unless it is necessary.  (Small functional footprint).
>
> It fixes an unnecessary incompatibility.
>
> I have seen no significant evidence for excluding the change.
>
> If upstream is unwilling, then downstream may include it in packaging.
>
> -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/