[Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again

[Gonzalo Odiard]

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <
alanjas at hotmail.com> wrote:

> This is an old change.. since Sugar 0.96 we make the changes of
> service_name by bundle_id
> and the class by exec sugar-activity..
>

Yes, and also we replaced the old toobars by the new toolbars,
but activities with the old toolbars continue working.


> If we change this again.. in wich sugar will be avaliable? Sugar 102?
>

I want include it in Sugar 0.100



> Personally, I update all my GTK-2 activities with bundle_id and exec some
> time ago.
>
> I offer me to make the patchs for the activities that have that problem..
>
>
Ok, but this is bigger than you and me.

We need think in the users, and make life easier to the deployments.

I really don't understand what is the problem.

Gonzalo


> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:24:15 -0200
>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again
> From: gonzalo at laptop.org
> To: alanjas at hotmail.com
> CC: manuq at laptop.org; dwnarvaez at gmail.com; sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>
> Alan,
> We don't maintain 700 and not all work.
> Breaking compatibility without a good reason is not good for any platform.
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <
> alanjas at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> That is Ceibal problem.. not our problem..
> We mantain more than 700 activities and all works.. if Ceibal want, their
> can fix very easy this "problem"
> (only change 1 line in the activity.info !!! )
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:12:31 -0200
>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again
> From: gonzalo at laptop.org
> To: alanjas at hotmail.com
> CC: manuq at laptop.org; dwnarvaez at gmail.com; sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>
> All the Cazaproblemas, all the things done by Ceibal (like the Biblioteca)
> at least.
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <
> alanjas at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >But anyway we have the problem of all the activities not available in
> aslo.
>
> Wich activities are not in aslo??
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:02:25 -0200
>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again
> From: gonzalo at laptop.org
> To: alanjas at hotmail.com
> CC: manuq at laptop.org; dwnarvaez at gmail.com; sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>
>
> Gonzalo: you have the list of activities that need be fixed?
>
> I have a list, but need do it again, because the process I used to
> get the last version from aslo is wrong.
>
> But anyway we have the problem of all the activities not available in aslo.
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:41:56 -0200
> From: gonzalo at laptop.org
> To: manuq at laptop.org
> CC: dwnarvaez at gmail.com; sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again
>
>
>
> Oh, good Gonzalo, this is the bug to solve then.  Your patch is in the
> correct direction, but allows GTK3 activities to use service_name,
> which I don't think is correct.  The fix should allow only GTK2
> activities to use service_name, and log a deprecation warning message,
> as you did.
>
>
> I don't see your point.
>
> Look at the code. activitybundle.py do not have logic to recognize gtk2 or
> gtk3
> activities. The patch is simple, why look for a more complicate logic,
> only to avoid new activities using service_name instead of bundle_id?
>
> We have a problem with old activities stopping working, not with new
> activities.
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> .. manuq ..
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131030/22b1f615/attachment.html>