[Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

>Uruguay have many activities that kids are using and aren't in any
OLPC/SugarLabs site

That's true, but these activities are created by "programmers", these
programmers should be informed about the change of the structure of the
activity. Reading the Sugar-Devel lists.. or SugarLabs Wiki.

I think:
Ceibal does not have many applications, so the problem is not very serious
..
The activities that are not in SugarLabs, (most) are sugarizations or Flash
Games (created by the Community)


(Sorry for my bad english)

Saludos.
Ignacio Rodríguez


2013/10/30 Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <alanjas at hotmail.com>

> >Uruguay have many activities that kids are using and aren't in any
> OLPC/SugarLabs site
>
> And where came from? spontaneous generation?
> We never will have control of the activities that someone make and put in
> their own site.
> That is a problem of who made the activity.
>
> We only fix our activities: all that are uploaded on SugarLabs site (aslo).
>
> ------------------------------
> From: ebordon at plan.ceibal.edu.uy
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:20:43 -0200
>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again
> To: alanjas at hotmail.com
> CC: gonzalo at laptop.org; manuq at laptop.org; dwnarvaez at gmail.com;
> sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>
>
> I think that it doesn't solve by fixing all activities. Anybody have an
> exhaustive list of all the activities. For example, here in Uruguay have
> many activities that kids are using and aren't in any OLPC/SugarLabs site.
>
> I think maintain backward compatibility for gtk2 activities is the best
> solution
>
> Esteban.
>
>
> 2013/10/30 Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <alanjas at hotmail.com>
>
> I think that we must check the GTK-2 version of all activities and fix that
> problem.
> Gonzalo: you have the list of activities that need be fixed?
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:41:56 -0200
> From: gonzalo at laptop.org
> To: manuq at laptop.org
> CC: dwnarvaez at gmail.com; sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again
>
>
>
> Oh, good Gonzalo, this is the bug to solve then.  Your patch is in the
> correct direction, but allows GTK3 activities to use service_name,
> which I don't think is correct.  The fix should allow only GTK2
> activities to use service_name, and log a deprecation warning message,
> as you did.
>
>
> I don't see your point.
>
> Look at the code. activitybundle.py do not have logic to recognize gtk2 or
> gtk3
> activities. The patch is simple, why look for a more complicate logic,
> only to avoid new activities using service_name instead of bundle_id?
>
> We have a problem with old activities stopping working, not with new
> activities.
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> .. manuq ..
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131030/dd3ecf1d/attachment-0001.html>