[Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again
Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
alanjas at hotmail.com
Wed Oct 30 14:26:01 EDT 2013
>Uruguay have many activities that kids are using and aren't in any OLPC/SugarLabs site
And where came from? spontaneous generation?We never will have control of the activities that someone make and put in their own site.That is a problem of who made the activity.
We only fix our activities: all that are uploaded on SugarLabs site (aslo).
From: ebordon at plan.ceibal.edu.uy
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:20:43 -0200
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again
To: alanjas at hotmail.com
CC: gonzalo at laptop.org; manuq at laptop.org; dwnarvaez at gmail.com; sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
I think that it doesn't solve by fixing all activities. Anybody have an exhaustive list of all the activities. For example, here in Uruguay have many activities that kids are using and aren't in any OLPC/SugarLabs site.
I think maintain backward compatibility for gtk2 activities is the best solution Esteban.
2013/10/30 Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <alanjas at hotmail.com>
I think that we must check the GTK-2 version of all activities and fix thatproblem.Gonzalo: you have the list of activities that need be fixed?
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:41:56 -0200
From: gonzalo at laptop.org
To: manuq at laptop.org
CC: dwnarvaez at gmail.com; sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again
Oh, good Gonzalo, this is the bug to solve then. Your patch is in the
correct direction, but allows GTK3 activities to use service_name,
which I don't think is correct. The fix should allow only GTK2
activities to use service_name, and log a deprecation warning message,
as you did.
I don't see your point.
Look at the code. activitybundle.py do not have logic to recognize gtk2 or gtk3activities. The patch is simple, why look for a more complicate logic,
only to avoid new activities using service_name instead of bundle_id?
We have a problem with old activities stopping working, not with new activities.
Gonzalo
Thanks,
--
.. manuq ..
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131030/146fbeed/attachment.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list