[Sugar-devel] Have we achieved consensus among activite Sugar developers?

[Daniel Narvaez]

I think

Phase 1. We certainly need more hands.
Phase 2. We have been trying to do a bit of that with the features
discussion. We are going to bootstrap 0.102 very soon and there will be a
chance to improve on what we did for 0.100. I won't personally have time to
write down a specification but I think it would be great if someone did.

On Wednesday, 30 October 2013, David Farning wrote:

> Have we achieved general consensus that the three phase approach I
> proposed earlier this week has the potential for establishing a
> mutually beneficial relationship while progressively rebuilding trust
> on both sides?
>
> I will be happy to answer any questions, but I would like to get to
> work. Talk is little more than a distraction without the accompanying
> code and credibility:(
>
> --
> David Farning
> Activity Central: http://www.activitycentral.com
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org <javascript:;>
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>


-- 
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131030/b47cc5dd/attachment.html>