[Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations.
Daniel Narvaez
dwnarvaez at gmail.com
Mon Oct 28 10:09:42 EDT 2013
On 23 October 2013 19:51, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:48 PM, David Farning
> <dfarning at activitycentral.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >> I don't understand what you are asking. Sugar Labs has always had a
> >> policy of working in the open.
> >
> > The degree of openness and transparency is our fundamental
> > disagreement. Best case is that the status quo works, Sugar Labs
> > thrives, and I am proven wrong. Worst case is that Sugar adopts to the
> > changing environment.
> >
>
> Not a clue as to what you are talking about. How about some
> transparency as to what our disagreement is?
>
> [snip]
>
Yes, please. I don't really understand where you are seeing lack of
openness and transparency.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131028/0cb09efb/attachment.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list