[Sugar-devel] How everyone can help with 0.100

[Peter Robinson]

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
> Weird. There is no tarball but the release has been tagged in git.
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libxklavier/tag/?id=libxklavier-5.4
>
> I wonder if they just forgot to upload the tarball...

I've poked to see what the deal is, once we have one I'll push updates
into Fedora initially for F-20+ and once it's had some breathing
likely for older releases if no gremlins appear. Thanks for that.

Peter

> On Tuesday, 8 October 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > By the way I think libxklavier 5.4 is not even in Fedora 19 but it's
>> > required for the keyboard control panel section to work.
>>
>> I've just checked this but presumably by 5.4 you mean an unreleased
>> version or SVC head because there is no 5.4 released as yet [1]
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> [1] http://download.gnome.org/sources/libxklavier/
>>
>> > On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>> >>
>> >> From memory gwebsockets 0.3, libxklavier 5.4, webkitgtk 2.0.x. There
>> >> are
>> >> almost certainly more deps. (We really need to start tracking our
>> >> dependencies more systematically but it's tricky).
>> >>
>> >> On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 10:57 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>> >>> > It would be nice but I think it would involve a non trivial amount
>> >>> > of
>> >>> > work to do it properly. It's not just rebuilding the sugar rpms,
>> >>> > there
>> >>> > are system dependencies that would need to be built... latest
>> >>> > libxklavier and webkitgtk comes to my mind, but there is probably
>> >>> > more.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> What versions of the above packages and gwebsockets are required?
>> >>>
>> >>> Jerry
>> >>>
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On 15 August 2013 05:12, Martin Abente
>> >>> > <martin.abente.lahaye at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >         +1 This would be great!
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >         On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
>> >>> >         <gonzalo at laptop.org> wrote:
>> >>> >                 +1 to have rpms to install over 13.2.0
>> >>> >                 In this way we can isolate for other changes on the
>> >>> >                 distro,
>> >>> >                 for every change in Fedora version, there are broken
>> >>> >                 pieces,
>> >>> >                 we learned that...
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >                 Gonzalo
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >                 On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:48 PM, James Cameron
>> >>> >                 <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
>> >>> >                         Yes, an image or a procedure for retrofit of
>> >>> >                         13.2.0 please.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >                         I think a retrofit might provide for wider
>> >>> >                         testing.  A set of RPMs to
>> >>> >                         download and install, then reboot?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >                         On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:28:14PM +0200,
>> >>> >                         Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>> >>> >                         > Being an OLPC list perhaps it's better to
>> >>> >                         wait we have a XO image before
>> >>> >                         > posting there?
>> >>> >                         >
>> >>> >                         >
>> >>> >                         > On 14 August 2013 15:26, Chris Leonard
>> >>> >                         <cjlhomeaddress at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >                         >
>> >>> >
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
>