[Sugar-devel] Next release

[Chris Leonard]

If a branch is going to be declared, we will need to address it in
Pootle as well.  Please advise.

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8 October 2013 00:43, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > It sounds like it might be an opportunity for upstream to get feedback
>> > from
>> > real users, which we need desperately. So I think it would be a good
>> > idea to
>> > "refocus" 0.100 around this deployment. So
>> >
>> > 1 Stay in bugfixing mode until January or when things are ready anyway.
>>
>> What about Sugar on a Stick? We're aiming for a release as usual in
>> conjunction with the release of Fedora 20. It would be better to get
>> out a stable release in time for that to get wider testing and then do
>> 0.100.x releases between then and January.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> since we are in bugfixing mode, I think in practice releasing 0.100 or not
> will make no difference to soas. In terms of code quality that is.
>
> I'm fine with releasing 0.100 in time for Fedora 20 though if you like. The
> next release is on 31/10 and my plan would be to keep doing releases every 4
> weeks after that. Which one would you like to be called 0.100?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>