[Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

[Daniel Narvaez]

On 7 October 2013 18:41, David Farning <dfarning at activitycentral.com> wrote:

> Would either of these list be appropriate to continue these
> discussions about this downstream efforts to port sugar to Ubuntu for
> use on hardware not sold by the Association?
>
> Phase one has been a poof of concept as seen at
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Ubuntu (ongoing)
> Phase two will be opening the project to the community.
> Phases three will be testing and piloting by deployments.


I would like to understand better what you mean with porting. It should
just be matter of writing package specs  (or really fixing the existing
ones...), no?

If there is any more work involved strongly suggest  you first discuss it
on this mailing list, then have it done upstream directly. That way the
whole community will benefit from your effort and you will benefit from the
community input. Upstreaming after the fact rarely works.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131007/ddeba2c5/attachment.html>