[Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

[Gonzalo Odiard]

I am not opposed to alternative implementations,
if we can "keep it simple".

This is a workaround for a problem, in the end, we want remove it,
when is not needed anymore.

Gonzalo


On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Rogelio Mita <
rogeliomita at activitycentral.com> wrote:

> Nice!, I quickly looked at the patch and I urged try to encapsulate the
> all logic of webkit2 and the webkit1 in separate modules, using a luck of
> strategy pattern or do something polymorphic, but I notice that it is a
> decision not yet taken (as Daniel says), I doubt whether to spend time on
> this for that reason, you will say, however when this decision is finally
> decided, I would like to make note of this style refactor to have clean
> webactivity module, which is relatively new and keep small, you think?
>
> Regards!
>
>
> 2013/11/27 Gonzalo Odiard <gonzalo at laptop.org>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I think it's good to have this upstream because otherwise changes to
>>> sugar-web will easily break webkit1 support.
>>>
>>> I'm not completely convinced we should support webkit1 yet. I'm worried
>>> it will be pretty painful to maintain. It should be possible to port
>>> webkitgtk 2.2 to Fedora 18...
>>>
>>>
>> Maybe, but have many other dependencies to update.
>>
>> Another alternative is find what is crashing in webkit2 and solve it, but
>> is out of my knowledge.
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Roger
>
> Activity Central <http://activitycentral.com/>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131127/13116e50/attachment.html>