[Sugar-devel] Python modules (Re: Introducing SimpleActivity / Introduciendo SimpleActivity

[Gonzalo Odiard]

We need think about the options.

I feel something wrong when think about multiple copies of the same
 code/library/data, but is true in some spaces the world is going in that
direction.

Also is true we already have a lot of code duplicated in the activities,
and without a good mechanism to get/update/sync.

Gonzalo


On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>wrote:

> On 22 November 2013 14:55, Gonzalo Odiard <gonzalo at laptop.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> For users connectivity should not be a problem because the modules would
>>> be shipped with the bundle. Or you mean a user trying to write an activity
>>> without connectivity?
>>>
>>>
>> Yes. Or with a system no longer updated (or not updated for many, many,
>> years, we have kids using the xo with a sugar image from 4 years ago)
>>
>
> Maybe something like a pypi local mirror (but containing only stuff
> relevant to sugar of course). So you would be able to use the same tools.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131122/ed44b3c8/attachment.html>