[Sugar-devel] Performance issues on XO 1 (Re: TamTamMini)
Manuel Quiñones
manuq at laptop.org
Tue Nov 19 13:39:51 EST 2013
2013/11/19 Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>:
> On 19 November 2013 12:44, Manuel Quiñones <manuq at laptop.org> wrote:
>>
>> I think this thread could be enhaced pointing to these other threads
>> opened by Daniel Drake in PyGObject mailing list:
>>
>>
>> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/python-hackers-list/2013-August/msg00003.html
>
>
> Thanks a lot for the links. What puzzles me there is how gi regressed
> compared to pygtk... As Johan Dahlin pointed out pygtk2 was registering
> everything.
>
> I agree with Tomeu that we should get rid of the overrides. It might take
> more time than we can afford to happen upstream of course :/
Yeah..
> But that brings me back to the previous point... why did we regress compared
> to pygtk2? Can we do anything about it?
>
>>
>>
>> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/python-hackers-list/2013-August/msg00002.html
>
>
> Has this landed?
Nothing mentioned in the release notes, so I guess no.
--
.. manuq ..
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list