[Sugar-devel] TamTamMini

Daniel Narvaez dwnarvaez at gmail.com
Mon Nov 18 18:41:27 EST 2013


Hi Flavio,

On 19 November 2013 00:02, Flavio Danesse <fdanesse at activitycentral.com>wrote:

> Sorry to put me back, but to bring a little clarity on TamTam:
>
> Do not say that the patch is huge because I never send a patch for this
> just to avoid giving this discussion which does not yield as well.
>
> If you look at my first mail on the subject I told him what I had done and
> posted where it was in case anyone wanted to look at, but never sent any
> patch. So, please do not complain about a patch that does not exist.
>

I and Walter was answering to David which comparing your contribution to
the Pippy patch, implied it was of the same kind.

*Your* position is very clear to me. The only part I don't understand is
why you are not trying to contribute patches upstream rather than
maintaining your own fork. I'm sorry to ask you again about that but really
I wish your contributions made it upstream!

I also said that because I never had previous patches approved on the same
> modifications to the application, which in each new version I had to return
> them.
>

I'm not sure I'm fully understanding you here. Are you saying you tried to
submit patches in the past and they was refused? Was they ignored?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131119/71831ed0/attachment.html>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list