[Sugar-devel] A prototype of SugarWeb / SugarAndroid - Technical questions
Daniel Narvaez
dwnarvaez at gmail.com
Thu Nov 14 06:24:48 EST 2013
I think there is a pretty fundamental issue we need to figure out, the
solution to several of the issues you pointed out depends on this.
Should activities be each a separate web application or should all the part
of the Sugar web application? Or more technically, should they have the
same origin or each a different one?
That has major consequences. For example a different origin gives each a
separate LocalStorage, which is great for security and namespacing but
makes, for example, communicating the xo color more complicated. A lot of
others standard web APIs are affected by the origin.
Security aside, this also affects how activities are "deployed". Do we want
to be able to run activities from a different web server or must everything
come from the same? If we want different web servers than I guess we are
sort of forced into multiple origins (though you could still download a
bundle from a different server and install on the main one).
For what it's worth in Sugar 0.100 each web activity has a different origin.
On 14 November 2013 10:03, Lionel Laské <lionel at olpc-france.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot for your messages regarding my work. Very appreciate to see
> enthusiasm here.
>
> I'm opening a different thread to talk about technical issues.
>
>
>
> Technically speaking my prototype is three things:
>
> - A Sugar Web Activities that mimic the desktop. This "activity" use
> the Sugar Web Framework (toolbar, xocolor, …) and is written using Enyo
> Framework (not the better JavaScript framework but it's my favorite one
> :-). The framework is "dynamic" so adding new activities is very easy (see
> here [4]). In fact, I hope to integrate a mechanism to install new activity
> from the desktop.
> - A directory name "activities" where I've unzip the content of .XO
> files for all web activities currently on Sugar App Store. The desktop
> activity just switch from an activity to another [5].
> - A PhoneGap encapsulation that allow to generate the Android APK. BTW
> because I'm using PhoneGap Build [1], it will also generate other platforms
> (iOS, webOS, …).
>
>
>
> Here are the major issues I've faced building the prototype (all source
> code is here [2]):
>
>
>
> - Multiple copy of Sugar Framework in each activity. My work was
> mostly a way to group existing Sugar Web activities. BTW I need to upgrade
> a part of the Sugar Web Framework to implement few features (Stop button,
> XO Colors, …). This upgrade concern today the bus.js file (most of the hack
> is here [3]) but this file is copied in each web activities :-( So I had to
> upgrade this file in each activity directory. I think we must find a way to
> allow the Sugar Web Framework to be deployed/referenced one time only.
> - Server side stuff. Today the Sugar Web Framework use Web Sockets to
> communicate with the system layer. It's good when running on Sugar but it's
> not a good idea in a Web-Browser only world because you can't have a
> process to listen Web Sockets. I think we should imagine a way to have a
> Sugar Web Framework that could work in stand-alone mode (without any server
> side). For example by using directly LocalStorage instead of waiting for a
> bus call. It's what I've done to retrieve xocolor [6]
> - HTML5 compatibility issues. Running existing Sugar Web Activities on
> tablets (XO Tablet and Samsung GalaxyTab) raise some issues regarding HTML5
> compatibility. Specifically some features (CustomEvent object, Blob object, window.webkitRequestAnimationFrame,
> …) used by the framework or by activities don't work everywhere due to
> WebKit compatibility. I think we should isolate these features (or avoid
> using it). Of course one another major issue is that the screen size could
> be very different from a device to another. Unfortunately activities are
> often linked to the XO screen size.
> - Environment. The Sugar Web Framework use an environment object
> (env.js), it seems to be used to detect the current platform but that I
> don't understand exactly how it works. Any explication regarding this point
> will be appreciate.
>
>
>
> Hope to have your proposal or feedbacks.
>
> Do not hesitate to ask me for more.
>
>
>
> Lionel.
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://build.phonegap.com/
>
> [2] https://github.com/llaske/SugarWebUI
>
> [3]
> https://github.com/llaske/SugarWebUI/blob/master/lib/sugar-web/bus.js#L150
>
> [4] https://github.com/llaske/SugarWebUI/blob/master/js/settings.js#L5
>
> [5] https://github.com/llaske/SugarWebUI/blob/master/js/settings.js#L65
>
> [6]
> https://github.com/llaske/SugarWebUI/blob/master/lib/sugar-web/bus.js#L168
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
--
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131114/2c4e835b/attachment.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list