[Sugar-devel] Performance: activities start up time
Daniel Narvaez
dwnarvaez at gmail.com
Fri Nov 8 14:43:32 EST 2013
We need to figure out why this is happening. It doesn't make any sense to
me that avoiding the evince lib import would save 13 seconds. You could
write a minimal test case, importing Gtk first, then time the Evince
import. If it takes a long time in the testcase too you could strace it to
see wtf is going on.
Local imports are a really bad idea for code maintenance.
On Friday, 8 November 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> There are many issues in Sugar regarding performance,
> but one of the more visible to the user is how much time the activities
> take to start. This is not so evident in newer hardware,
> but is important in XO-1. Is so important than by example, Peru will use
> sugar 0.94
> instead of a newer because o this.
>
> I was doing some testing with the main activities:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0As_jQJX0Me6XdDI2clFpX1FFRHhKMHVFZGkyakdST2c&usp=drive_web#gid=0
>
> (These measures were done in a XO-1)
>
> I first blamed to the port from gtk2 to gtk3 of the big regressions in
> performance,
> but after looking with a little of detail, some can be solved easily.
>
> One of the arguments of the dynamic bindings was a better startup time due
> to not need initialize all the libraries until is needed use them. Then the
> import should
> be lighter than before. Looks like that is not so true.
>
> In the case of Write activity, I was able to reduce the start up in 7 or 8
> seconds, just delaying the gstreamer initialization [1], and 1 or 2 seconds
> more delaying two other imports.
>
> In the case of Browse activity, just delaying the import of Evince
> libraries to the moment when a pdf is opened, improve the start up time in
> 13 seconds (patch attached). The start up time is even better than the
> version in 0.94
>
> I think this work of identify big libraries used only in specific moments,
> can be applied in other cases.
>
> Gonzalo
>
> [1]
> http://git.sugarlabs.org/write/mainline/commit/5dd843cf415d0c65e2927540225b0098f2b71cd0
> [2]
> http://git.sugarlabs.org/write/mainline/commit/dba223f5749f510735692a06f246acee30ab50bf
>
>
--
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131108/f53829b8/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list