[Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar tryout (was Re: sugarlabs.org redesign)
Thomas Gilliard
satellitgo at gmail.com
Fri Nov 8 12:25:42 EST 2013
On 11/8/2013 8:49 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Do we really need a single installer? I mean I see it would be ideal
> but it feels like it might be tricky licensing, implementation and
> maintenance wise.
>
> From what I understand from Thomas, after installing VirtualBox, it's
> just downloading and clicking on an icon (I should really try it but
> I'm on a bad connection these days). It might not be perfect but
> it doesn't really sound bad, what is stopping us marketing Sugar this
> way really?
>
> On Friday, 8 November 2013, Sean DALY wrote:
>
> Not only doable, has been done for some time now [1,2] and is
> multi-platform (& what I use to demo Sugar on a Mac)
>
> The Oracle PUEL license [3] very interestingly permits free
> redistribution for educational purposes, opening the possibility
> of a single installer, ideal for our needs.
>
> In the past I have suggested approaching Oracle for a marketing
> partnership under a CSR (corporate social responsibility) banner.
>
> Sean
>
> 1. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/VirtualBox
> 2. https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Creation_Kit/VirtualBox
> 2. https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/VirtualBox_PUEL
>
>
Here are some wiki pages and some older links from collaboration on
sugar with cyberorg (india) on #opensuse-edu on freenode IRC:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/OpenSUSE#OpenSuse-Sugar
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dramwang/images/
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dramwang/images/iso/
To write a USB:
download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dramwang/images/sugar.i686-0.3.0-Build7.5.raw.xz
Hosted Here: (used to have a sugar vmx hosted here' since removed)
We should consider placing some of the VirtualBox exports on
sourceforge.net:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/opensuse-edu/
Recent e-mail:
Re: [opensuse-edu] Final spurt: openSUSE Education for 13.1
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:10:25 -0700 satellit<satellitgo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>>> I hope a new sugar-desktop will become available. I see that
>>>> latest in
>>>>
>>>> build system was for : sugar 0.96.3:
>>>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/OpenSUSE#Sugar_12.1
> ok: I hopefully brought most of the packages to the current/stable
> version (not 0.99x, but, hey: 0.98).
>
> But now I need to ask the maintainers about the final setup, the
> publishing (some packages have explicitely set "no publishing") and
> some special packages.
>
> For the first "problem", I guess someone just needs to go throught the
> packages and check their (publish/build) settings, so that we get a
> final release once everything built as expected.
>
> ...but I'm unsure about SDL (upgrade) and the olpcsound package
> (upgrate from 5.10 to 6.01). Any preferences? Any ideas?
>
> With kind regards,
> Lars (Vogdt)
Tom Gilliard
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Gonzalo Odiard <gonzalo at laptop.org
> <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'gonzalo at laptop.org');>> wrote:
>
> At least the virtualbox looks doable and a good way to show
> Sugar.
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> <dwnarvaez at gmail.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'dwnarvaez at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 7 November 2013, Sean DALY wrote:
>
> The larger problem is the absence of a marketing
> strategy, we need to know where we are going to
> communicate effectively. In particular, we need to
> choose and implement how to offer Sugar tryout to
> teachers and journalists.
>
>
> I can think of a couple of approaches
>
> * Get Sugar running well on the CuBox-i. Find budget to
> buy a few of those to distribute to chosen journalist and
> teachers. Try to partner with SolidRun to offer Sugar as
> an out-of-the-box installation option.
>
> * Make it easy to run Sugar inside VirtualBox on Windows
> and OS X. Without having investigated too deeply it
> seems that a two step process would be both realistically
> implementable and easy enough for the user
>
> 1 Install virtualbox
> 2 Install a Sugar application (which would take care of
> setting up the appliance).
>
> Thoughts? Other ideas? If we can agree on one or two
> concrete, realistic approaches, I think we can at least
> attempt to get them done for 3.102.
>
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Marketing mailing list
> Marketing at lists.sugarlabs.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'Marketing at lists.sugarlabs.org');>
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Marketing mailing list
> Marketing at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131108/b9cbd71e/attachment.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list