[Sugar-devel] RFC: Make Sugar 0.102 = Sugar 1.0[ Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 61, Issue 43]

[Daniel Narvaez]

Hmm I suppose the 1.x -> 2.x switch would have not made sense to marketing
because there wasn't major user visible changes?

On Thursday, 7 November 2013, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:

>
>
> For sugar developers their is certainly a continuation in development and
> the current numbering makes a lot of sense.
> However, looking from outside 0.102 should be Sugar 3.x where  1.x is the
> original, 2.x is the Gtk3/introspection move and now the html5/jc
> (online/ultrabook/tablet) version.
> If you actually consider 0.100 as 3.0 then it can go 3.2, 3.4 etc to keep
> up with current numbering.
> Should make marketing happy with minimal disruption.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org <javascript:;>
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>


-- 
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131107/b4361dec/attachment.html>