[Sugar-devel] Going Forward (Sugar oversight board meeting)

[Daniel Narvaez]

I agree too but I'm not sure anyone on this thread was saying something
different :)

On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Tony Anderson wrote:

>  +1 Well said!
>
> On 11/05/2013 04:03 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> Having been involved in the OLPC OS side of things I believe you would
>> be much better taking the work done by OLPC with things like
>> olpc-os-builder and the work upstream with Fedora to use it to build
>> out OS images that will work in a similar way across both XOs and
>> other HW be it x86 netbook or cheap ARM devices rather than
>> reinventing the wheel!
>> We already have the basis of the educational experience from the
>> current releases of Sugar. In terms of HW I think we should use
>> upstream distros and let them care about the HW and work with one or
>> two of them to ensure that the Sugar experience on them is great OOTB
>> so that people can then focus on development of the platform. That's
>> what I've been doing with Fedora and Sugar for 5 years! IMO the sugar
>> OOTB there "just works"
>>
>> Peter
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>


-- 
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131105/5bb6f013/attachment-0001.html>