[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Anyone running sugar-build on i386 distros?

[Daniel Narvaez]

I went ahead and dropped jessie and raring i386 slaves.


On 24 May 2013 16:09, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yeah I think that probably make sense. Even if someone uses i386, if stuff
> works on $DISTRO-x86_64 _and_ it works on Fedora i386, I think it's very
> very likely it will work on $DISTRO-i386 too.
>
>
> On 24 May 2013 15:52, Simon Schampijer <simon at schampijer.de> wrote:
>
>> On 05/24/2013 03:49 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if anyone at all is using sugar-build on i386. I suppose
>>> everyone has x86_64 hardware these days but maybe people are still
>>> installing i386 distros, it's the Ubuntu default for example.
>>>
>>> It's just that maintaing i386 buildbot slaves is a bit of a waste if no
>>> one
>>> is using it. We should keep one slave to make sure stuff keep working
>>> there
>>> but... maybe we don't need one per distro.
>>>
>>
>> It is true that even myself switched these days to x86_64 for my
>> development environment. Maybe just keep the Fedora one around, I expect
>> the most users there, if.
>>
>> Regards,
>>    Simon
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.**org <Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/**listinfo/sugar-devel<http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
>



-- 
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130524/5b9062da/attachment.html>