[Sugar-devel] Requiring test coverage for new code

[James Cameron]

On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 06:21:54PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Marco would do 2 and then consider if we can move to 1.
> Manuel would like 2.
> Walter would be happy with 2, as long as there is guidance.
> Gonzalo and James doesn't seem happy about requiring tests at all.

No, I don't mind requiring tests, but I don't think the reasons you gave
were supported by evidence.  I wanted to see that evidence, that's all.

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/