[Sugar-devel] Requiring test coverage for new code

[Daniel Narvaez]

On 17 May 2013 15:53, Manuel Quiñones <manuq at laptop.org> wrote:

> And for the html sugar, we should do full coverage testing.>>>>
>

You mean make check enforced 100% coverage? :) I would love it.

You proposed it, so people hate should be directed to you! I did it with a
project I and always felt sort of guilty about people swearing while trying
to cover every single little code branch :P
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130517/a08f34e0/attachment-0001.html>