[Sugar-devel] [PATCH sugar] Fallback to _NET_WM_PID to map windows to activities

[Daniel Narvaez]

Hmm I sort of wonder why we are not using WM_CLASS = activity_id,
activity_name.


On 1 May 2013 15:10, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 1 May 2013 14:08, Daniel Drake <dsd at laptop.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > It has been a while since I wrote this patch, hopefully I'm not
>> > misremembering... I think NotifyLaunch is in practice private to the
>> shell,
>> > activities should have no need to use it (and are not supposed to be
>> > importing activityfactory.py).
>>
>> When I tested it yesterday it did break activity launch until I fixed
>> the toolkit for this API change.
>>
>
> Yeah, because the shell is using that code. But I don't think activities
> are/should be using it, so the change shouldn't break non python
> activities.
>



-- 
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130504/f0cdbe72/attachment-0001.html>