[Sugar-devel] Features for 0.100

[Daniel Narvaez]

This sounds like a pretty cool feature with a simple enough implementation.
I'd say it's a good idea for 0.100.


On 28 March 2013 23:37, Ignacio Rodríguez <nachoel01 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I have my feature  :)
>
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change
>
> PD: Walter I need the *.patch ¿Remember?
>
>
> 2013/3/28 Martin Abente <martin.abente.lahaye at gmail.com>
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> we already had a bit of discussion on what 0.100 should focus on in
>>> the schedule thread. I'll try to summarize it here.
>>>
>>> IMPORTANT: the consensus seems to be that we should be having the
>>> discussion about features early this cycle, to try and narrow the
>>> scope of the release as much as possible. So here is your chance to
>>> propose features, there won't be a feature acceptance deadline later.
>>>
>>> * Simon proposed that we make html5 activities the main focus of the
>>> release and people responded favorably (do you think that's a bad
>>> idea? Please speak up!). We need to articulate better what this
>>> involves exactly, which new glucose components will have to be
>>> developed, which activities. There as been some experimentation but
>>> there is more left to do, the initial part of the cycle will involve
>>> research.
>>>
>>> * Ajay proposed a couple of features which has been delayed from
>>> previous cycles.
>>>
>>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection
>>>
>>> There is some concern that it might be too big of a change. We should
>>> probably decide on the base of the patches that Ajay will be sending
>>> out soon.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I hope everyone considers that the journal-multi-selection feature has
>> passed through several iterations of design and code review already. This a
>> great improvement to journal's usability and is already being used in the
>> ground.
>>
>> It was a joint effort between many SL community members since EduJAM
>> 2011, so I think there should be a consensus towards accepting it.
>>
>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support
>>>
>>> It seems to be ready to go in.
>>>
>>> * Walter proposed a few other features which went already through
>>> several reviews (do we have feature pages for these perhaps?)
>>>
>>> - homeview background image
>>>
>>
>> I know, at first hand, that Caacupe (Paraguay) kids will be more than
>> happy with this ^. We should support also features that makes Sugar more
>> enjoyable to it's users.
>>
>>
>>> - multi-homeview
>>>
>> - webservices
>>> - comment field in journal detail view
>>>
>>>
>> We should also keep in mind that webservices can offer a lot of utilities
>> for deployments in the near future, and it will give Sugar a another way to
>> expand its capabilities without "writing-from-scratch" everything.
>>
>>
>>>
>>
>> So 0.100 seems to be shaping up as a release devoted mainly to html5
>>> activities, while landing a few features which are almost ready. What
>>> does everyone think about that?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Narvaez
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>


-- 
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130329/0e7a825d/attachment-0001.html>