[Sugar-devel] Features for 0.100

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Walter, you have the *.zip in your mail :P (Remember?)


2013/3/28 Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com>

> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez <nachoel01 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I have my feature  :)
> >
> > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change
> >
> > PD: Walter I need the *.patch ¿Remember?
>
> OK. Can you point me to the code in git?
>
> -walter
> >
> >
> > 2013/3/28 Martin Abente <martin.abente.lahaye at gmail.com>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> we already had a bit of discussion on what 0.100 should focus on in
> >>> the schedule thread. I'll try to summarize it here.
> >>>
> >>> IMPORTANT: the consensus seems to be that we should be having the
> >>> discussion about features early this cycle, to try and narrow the
> >>> scope of the release as much as possible. So here is your chance to
> >>> propose features, there won't be a feature acceptance deadline later.
> >>>
> >>> * Simon proposed that we make html5 activities the main focus of the
> >>> release and people responded favorably (do you think that's a bad
> >>> idea? Please speak up!). We need to articulate better what this
> >>> involves exactly, which new glucose components will have to be
> >>> developed, which activities. There as been some experimentation but
> >>> there is more left to do, the initial part of the cycle will involve
> >>> research.
> >>>
> >>> * Ajay proposed a couple of features which has been delayed from
> >>> previous cycles.
> >>>
> >>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection
> >>>
> >>> There is some concern that it might be too big of a change. We should
> >>> probably decide on the base of the patches that Ajay will be sending
> >>> out soon.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> I hope everyone considers that the journal-multi-selection feature has
> >> passed through several iterations of design and code review already.
> This a
> >> great improvement to journal's usability and is already being used in
> the
> >> ground.
> >>
> >> It was a joint effort between many SL community members since EduJAM
> 2011,
> >> so I think there should be a consensus towards accepting it.
> >>
> >>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support
> >>>
> >>> It seems to be ready to go in.
> >>>
> >>> * Walter proposed a few other features which went already through
> >>> several reviews (do we have feature pages for these perhaps?)
> >>>
> >>> - homeview background image
> >>
> >>
> >> I know, at first hand, that Caacupe (Paraguay) kids will be more than
> >> happy with this ^. We should support also features that makes Sugar more
> >> enjoyable to it's users.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> - multi-homeview
> >>>
> >>> - webservices
> >>> - comment field in journal detail view
> >>>
> >>
> >> We should also keep in mind that webservices can offer a lot of
> utilities
> >> for deployments in the near future, and it will give Sugar a another
> way to
> >> expand its capabilities without "writing-from-scratch" everything.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So 0.100 seems to be shaping up as a release devoted mainly to html5
> >>> activities, while landing a few features which are almost ready. What
> >>> does everyone think about that?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Daniel Narvaez
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Sugar-devel mailing list
> >>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sugar-devel mailing list
> >> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130328/9e2e8d10/attachment.html>