[Sugar-devel] Features for 0.100

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

I have my feature  :)

http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change

PD: Walter I need the *.patch ¿Remember?


2013/3/28 Martin Abente <martin.abente.lahaye at gmail.com>

>
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> we already had a bit of discussion on what 0.100 should focus on in
>> the schedule thread. I'll try to summarize it here.
>>
>> IMPORTANT: the consensus seems to be that we should be having the
>> discussion about features early this cycle, to try and narrow the
>> scope of the release as much as possible. So here is your chance to
>> propose features, there won't be a feature acceptance deadline later.
>>
>> * Simon proposed that we make html5 activities the main focus of the
>> release and people responded favorably (do you think that's a bad
>> idea? Please speak up!). We need to articulate better what this
>> involves exactly, which new glucose components will have to be
>> developed, which activities. There as been some experimentation but
>> there is more left to do, the initial part of the cycle will involve
>> research.
>>
>> * Ajay proposed a couple of features which has been delayed from
>> previous cycles.
>>
>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection
>>
>> There is some concern that it might be too big of a change. We should
>> probably decide on the base of the patches that Ajay will be sending
>> out soon.
>>
>>
>
> I hope everyone considers that the journal-multi-selection feature has
> passed through several iterations of design and code review already. This a
> great improvement to journal's usability and is already being used in the
> ground.
>
> It was a joint effort between many SL community members since EduJAM 2011,
> so I think there should be a consensus towards accepting it.
>
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support
>>
>> It seems to be ready to go in.
>>
>> * Walter proposed a few other features which went already through
>> several reviews (do we have feature pages for these perhaps?)
>>
>> - homeview background image
>>
>
> I know, at first hand, that Caacupe (Paraguay) kids will be more than
> happy with this ^. We should support also features that makes Sugar more
> enjoyable to it's users.
>
>
>> - multi-homeview
>>
> - webservices
>> - comment field in journal detail view
>>
>>
> We should also keep in mind that webservices can offer a lot of utilities
> for deployments in the near future, and it will give Sugar a another way to
> expand its capabilities without "writing-from-scratch" everything.
>
>
>>
>
> So 0.100 seems to be shaping up as a release devoted mainly to html5
>> activities, while landing a few features which are almost ready. What
>> does everyone think about that?
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Narvaez
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130328/89d3e866/attachment-0001.html>