[Sugar-devel] 0.100 release schedule

[Daniel Narvaez]

Can you elaborate on the reason? Refining features might require
breaking String/UI/ABI?

On 27 March 2013 15:30, Gonzalo Odiard <gonzalo at laptop.org> wrote:
> IMHO, Feature should not be frozen at the same time than String, UI and ABI
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> here is an initial schedule for 0.100
>>
>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Roadmap
>>
>> Notes:
>>
>> * Still unclear if it's going to be 0.100 or 1.0. We should probably
>> decide after we know what the focus of the release is going to be.
>> * I have not allocated dates for unstable tarballs. Is it actually
>> worth spending time building those? Is anyone using them?
>> * I merged a few freezes together to simplify things.
>> * Relevant GNOME and Fedora schedules are still unknown so I couldn't
>> try to sync with those.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Narvaez
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>



-- 
Daniel Narvaez