[Sugar-devel] 0.100 release schedule
dwnarvaez at gmail.com
Wed Mar 27 10:33:05 EDT 2013
Can you elaborate on the reason? Refining features might require
On 27 March 2013 15:30, Gonzalo Odiard <gonzalo at laptop.org> wrote:
> IMHO, Feature should not be frozen at the same time than String, UI and ABI
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
>> here is an initial schedule for 0.100
>> * Still unclear if it's going to be 0.100 or 1.0. We should probably
>> decide after we know what the focus of the release is going to be.
>> * I have not allocated dates for unstable tarballs. Is it actually
>> worth spending time building those? Is anyone using them?
>> * I merged a few freezes together to simplify things.
>> * Relevant GNOME and Fedora schedules are still unknown so I couldn't
>> try to sync with those.
>> Daniel Narvaez
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
More information about the Sugar-devel