[Sugar-devel] Unstable releases

[Daniel Narvaez]

On 26 June 2013 19:02, Daniel Drake <dsd at laptop.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > we was supposed to release 0.99.0 today but we have not tarballs to ship
> > because the maintainers have been to busy to deal with that.
> >
> > I already brought this up when we came up with the 0.100 roadmap but let
> me
> > try again. Assuming we find resources to release, who is going to test
> that
> > code? I suspect no one is going to, which makes releasing a waste of
> > precious maintainers time.
>
> There might not be a lot of testing, but some does happen. Here is one
> example: these unstable tarballs will be built in Fedora (thanks
> Peter) and then included in SoaS development builds, which are
> frequently tested by satellit.
>
>
Thanks. I would appreciate pointers about SoaS development builds. How
frequently they are built, what they are based on (F19/F20) etc.


> In the past such releases have also been shipped in OLPC development
> builds.
>

 Is OLPC going to do build this cycle?

-- 
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130626/8472fa20/attachment.html>