[Sugar-devel] Sugar build break

Daniel Narvaez dwnarvaez at gmail.com
Tue Jun 25 13:09:39 EDT 2013


I tried to move to Xvnc several months ago but... I was getting crashes on
Ubuntu with it too so I gave up. Might be worth for someone to reevaluate,
I don't know.


On 25 June 2013 18:59, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <alanjas at hotmail.com> wrote:

> And use VNC instead Xephyr?
>
>
> http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/attachment/ticket/1659/0001-sugar-emulator-use-vnc-instead-of-Xephyr-1659.patch
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:29:57 +0200
> From: dwnarvaez at gmail.com
> To: alanjas at hotmail.com
> CC: sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org; suraj.gillespie at gmail.com;
> nachoel01 at gmail.com
>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar build break
>
> The situation with Xephyr in generally is pretty sad. It's buggy and
> pretty much unmaintained. It's supposed to be replaced by
> xf86-video-nested, which was published a couple of years ago but doesn't
> seem to have made it to any distribution yet (and doesn't seem to be
> actively developed either).
>
> We could probably change sugar-runner to always use a full X server, that
> would be more reliable, but there are people that prefer to develop with
> sugar in a window rather than fullscreen...
>
> _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>



-- 
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130625/14373e3b/attachment.html>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list