[Sugar-devel] draft language asking permission to relicense (was Re: Licensing of the javascript libraries)

[Daniel Narvaez]

There might be a few more people in some of the files I've seen after
making that list. I'll try to send a complete list asap.

On Thursday, 20 June 2013, Walter Bender wrote:

> It is a relatively short list:
>
> Walter Bender (walter at sugarlabs.org <javascript:;>)  I approve
> Dan Williams dcbw at redhat.org <javascript:;>
> Gary Martin garycmartin at gmail.com <javascript:;>
> Christian Marc Schmidt anything at christianmarcschmidt.com <javascript:;>
> Tomeu Vizoso tomeu.vizoso at gmail.com <javascript:;>
> Manuel Quinones manuq at laptop.org <javascript:;>
> Eben Eliason eben.eliason at gmail.com <javascript:;>
> Marco Pesenti Gritti marco at marcopg.org <javascript:;>
> Benjamin Berg benzea at sugarlabs.org <javascript:;>
>
> Did I miss anyone?
>
> regards.
>
> -walter
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Tony Sebro <tony at sfconservancy.org<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > On 06/18/2013 12:19 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> >>
> >> Meanwhile, Conservancy can help draft an email for permission to assent.
> >> I'll coordinate with Tony on it and get back to you as soon as we can.
> >
> > Hi, all:
> > Here's some draft language we can use to collect the consent of various
> > copyright holders to the relicensing of code under the Apache license.
> >
> > If you give Conservancy a clear git log of people to contact, we can do
> the
> > work of collecting and recording the responses of contributors.
> >
> > Best,
> > -Tony
> >
> > ----
> > Hello;
> >
> > You're receiving this email because you are a contributor of code and/or
> > other copyrighted content to the Sugar Labs project.  Software Freedom
> > Conservancy is the nonprofit corporate home of Sugar Labs, and we thank
> you
> > for your contribution.
> >
> > We're writing you ask that you grant Conservancy and Sugar Labs
> permission
> > to relicense the code and associated files stored in the
> > https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-artwork repository (currently
> licensed
> > under LGPL v2 or later) under the Apache License 2.0 as a second license.
> > The result would be that everything in that repository would be available
> > for use under both the LGPL2+ and the Apache License 2.0 concurrently.
> >
> > By adding the Apache License as a second license, Sugar Labs would be
> able
> > to reuse code from /sugar-artwork in javascript libraries under the
> Apache
> > license, and include javascript libraries licensed under the Apache
> License
> > inside Sugar Labs application bundles [note:  feel free to suggest a
> > stronger/more clearly-articulated rationale as a replacement. -Tony]
> >
> > Please indicate your permission by replying to this email with the
> > following:
> > - the words "I approve."
> > - your full name
> >
> > We'll keep your email as record of your consent.
> >
> > Thanks again for your contribution and your continued support of the
> Sugar
> > Labs project.
> >
> > --
> > Tony Sebro, General Counsel, Software Freedom Conservancy
> > +1-212-461-3245 x11
> > tony at sfconservancy.org <javascript:;>
> > www.sfconservancy.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>


-- 
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130620/3db71f81/attachment-0001.html>