[Sugar-devel] Licensing of the javascript libraries
Daniel Narvaez
dwnarvaez at gmail.com
Mon Jun 17 14:53:38 EDT 2013
On 12 June 2013 13:21, Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org> wrote:
> Walter Bender wrote at 09:52 (EDT) on Tuesday:
> > For the Javascipt/HTML5 work, we are going to use Apache and would
> > like to fold in the artwork that is currently LGPL. So presumably a
> > second license is required. Any protocol for this that you recommend?
> > I'm happy to reach out to the authors.
>
> Yes, while there is no formal protocol, the usual process is to work
> through the entire git repository, find all those who have contributed,
> build a list of them, and then start collecting permission. It's a
> relatively simple record keeping task. Conservancy is happy to help if
> you'd like.
>
Sorry for the delay, I wanted to make sure the decision to go for Apache
was solid.
I made a list of contributors. I'm not sure what's the best way to collect
permission though. For example, should we email the contributors keeping a
list in cc so that we have a public record?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130617/d46fe62c/attachment.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list