[Sugar-devel] Licensing of the javascript libraries

[Daniel Narvaez]

On 13 June 2013 11:26, Simon Schampijer <simon at schampijer.de> wrote:

> On 06/13/2013 01:32 AM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
>
>> 2013/6/7 Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> I'm still undecided really but since it's important to make a call soon,
>>> my
>>> vote goes for Apache, both for sugar-web and for activities we develop.
>>>
>>
>> I'm far from expert on licenses, but given Daniel Narvaez description,
>> I vote for Apache too.
>>
>> --
>> .. manuq ..
>>
>
> Mozilla for gaia seems to be going for the Apache 2 license [1]. Here are
> two posts with some background information about the licensing [2][3].
>
> I could not find any information about what is the license that can/should
> be used in the web apps developed for Firefox OS. The example apps have
> different ones, some none, the documentation does not talk about it.
>

I guess that's left to the activity authors to decide.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130613/95863af4/attachment-0001.html>