[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Running gtk2 activities in the latest sugar-build

[Daniel Narvaez]

What do you mean with revoke support?

I removed support for gtk2 activities from sugar-build because I wanted to
simplify things a bit. The new html stuff added a lot of dependencies and
modules, it was getting out of control.

But nothing other then sugar-build changed, in respect to gtk2. Any reason
you can't use the Fedora sugar packages?

IMO it doesn't make sense to keep working on gtk2 activities. They should
be ported first. But that's just my opinion, I'm sure there are people that
disagree.



On 3 June 2013 11:27, Aneesh Dogra <lionaneesh at gmail.com> wrote:

> Any other way? Someone is already working on the Gtk3 port and I wanted to
> get the important features out in the next release. BTW why did we revoke
> support for Gtk2 activities?
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> sugar-build does not support gtk2 activities. Perhaps you can just
>> install the fedora packages? Or you could port the activity to gtk3 first :)
>>
>>
>>  On 1 June 2013 10:41, Aneesh Dogra <lionaneesh at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hey List,
>>>
>>> I can't seem to import sugar.* At first look, it seems like we have
>>> renamed/deleted sugar from the sugar-build packages.json file. I am working
>>> on Calculate which is still not ported to Gtk3 and hence I am working on
>>> some features on the gtk2 version. Can help me to setup the environment
>>> please?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks
>>> Aneesh Dogra (lionaneesh)
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Narvaez
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> Aneesh Dogra (lionaneesh)
>



-- 
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130603/316134e0/attachment-0001.html>