[Sugar-devel] [support-gang] http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4285#comment:7

[Peter Robinson]

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Daniel Drake <dsd at laptop.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Thomas Gilliard
> <satellit at bendbroadband.com> wrote:
>> My Settings/ Software Update is important to have for both fedora 18
>> sugar-desktop and the fedora 18 Sugar on a Stick spin.
>
> Nobody doubts that its a bug worth fixing, but resources are limited,
> so we set priorities. Maybe you can help us reprioritise it by
> explaining why it is so important for these two use cases.
>
> To me this it is not of obviously high importance, since this software
> update component is not able to update any of the software shipped in
> those 2 platforms (they ship systemwide activities, and the updater in
> question cannot touch these).

I agree that this isn't important in sugar for SoaS, I would actually
prefer someone did a PackageKit interface to allow people to apply OS
updates and to select non default Sugar Activities that we ship in
Fedora.

Peter