[Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 62, Issue 86
Sai Vineet
saivineet89 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 31 06:38:56 EST 2013
I'd like to work on the Dictionary approach. And btw, I like to be called
Vineet :)
And also Manage Home Views activity(by Ignacio), needs porting. Lot of
things need porting. I suggest adding tasks for them, although only 6 days
are left ...
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 8:27 PM, <sugar-devel-request at lists.sugarlabs.org>wrote:
> Send Sugar-devel mailing list submissions to
> sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sugar-devel-request at lists.sugarlabs.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> sugar-devel-owner at lists.sugarlabs.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Sugar-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Gambiarra game (Luiz Irber)
> 2. Sugar Labs Oversight Board 2014 (Luke Faraone)
> 3. Re: From GConf to GSettings (Daniel Narvaez)
> 4. Re: Sugar Labs Oversight Board 2014 (Dr. Gerald Ardito)
> 5. Re: [ASLO] Release XO Help-17.1 (Gonzalo Odiard)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 17:44:34 -0200
> From: Luiz Irber <luiz.irber at cptec.inpe.br>
> To: Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>
> Cc: "sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org"
> <sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>, "fabiocpn at gmail.com"
> <fabiocpn at gmail.com>, Gonzalo Odiard <gonzalo at laptop.org>,
> Walter
> Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com>, "gabrielgeraldo at gmail.com"
> <gabrielgeraldo at gmail.com>, Aleksey Lim <alsroot at sugarlabs.org>,
> Alan
> Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <alanjas at hotmail.com>, Bernie Innocenti
> <bernie at codewiz.org>, "alexandre at harano.net.br"
> <alexandre at harano.net.br>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Gambiarra game
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAKhAhPDqxSDWus+DiSaW86cTPvBGjje8isQoQSpnMfzdL7JEsQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hello, sorry for causing all this problem =]
>
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On 24 December 2013 23:36, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <alanjas at hotmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> No. I only aswer this email (see below).
> >> The mantainer is not "Unresponsive", only takes more of 1 month to
> >> asnwer, that what is?
> >> "slow modem connection user"? :-)
> >>
> >
> > Well, to start with give him more of a chance :) He didn't answer to one
> > email, he might have missed it, forgot about it or even thought you
> didn't
> > need an answer to go ahead and post the merge request.
> >
>
> About that, maybe I wasn't clear enough in my previous answer, but what I
> wanted to say was exactly what Daniel said: just go ahead and make a merge
> request. And yes, I missed this email thread, only today a friend pointed
> that something was happening.
>
>
> > If a maintainer is very slow but it's clear he wants to review code
> before
> > it's pushed, I don't think we should do so without his permission. It's
> his
> > project, he is even free to reject perfectly good code without looking at
> > it, if he wants.
> >
>
> I'm not planning to deny merge requests, but I think code review is a good
> practice. OK, four years ago we didnt't do it, but nowadays it is important
> =]
>
> Luiz
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131229/8deabd42/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 12:36:47 -0800
> From: Luke Faraone <luke at sugarlabs.org>
> To: IAEP SugarLabs <iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org>, Sugar Devel
> <sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> Subject: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs Oversight Board 2014
> Message-ID: <52C087DF.6070305 at sugarlabs.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hello all,
>
> Since we only had three candidates for three slots, the three candidates
> will assume their roles on the board. That is,
>
> * Chris Leonard (cjl) 2013 Candidate Statement
> <http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Cjl/Candidate_Statement>
> * Walter Bender 2013 Candidate Statement
> <
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Walter#Regarding_the_Sugar_Labs_Oversight_Board
> >
> * Jose Miguel Garcia (Jmgarcia) 2013 Candidate Statement
> <http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Jmgarcia>
>
>
> are members of the Sugar Labs Oversight Board effective 1 January, 2014.
>
> --
>
> __
> (_ Luke Faraone, Web Infrastructure
> __)ugarLabs.org
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:50:37 +0000
> From: Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>
> To: Emil Dudev <emildudev at gmail.com>
> Cc: "sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org"
> <sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] From GConf to GSettings
> Message-ID:
> <
> CANTHhvacS52vZrbRAsKa8qhSnRNxBAzS48Uui38T9adsNQr1KA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Adding the list. By the way we should discuss this with Sai too, he is
> working on a patch which is similar and might even conflict.
>
> I'm travelling and just on an iPhone so it's hard for me to properly look
> at the code and suggest something. I can do so when I get back home,
> probably in a few days.
>
> Something I'm wondering is if we should turn all the favorites stuff into a
> dictionary. If I remember correctly, the current code is basically trying
> to make a dictionary using dynamic key names? And Sai is adding another
> property using that approach.
>
> If the dictionary idea make sense, we can then discuss how to avoid
> conflicts.
>
> On Sunday, 29 December 2013, Emil Dudev wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > It's hard to find you on IRC.
> >
> > I've managed to port the rest of sugar to use GSettings. I doubt you'll
> > like my solution, but I couldn't find a better one.
> > Commit:
> >
> https://github.com/edudev/sugar/commit/7b6f5af3783bd48c6891e712268dffb284dadbd7
> > When I checked my settings in GConf, I found that for these keys they are
> > at their default values. I think that so is with the rest of sugar's
> > community, so I don't think that a special data conversion is needed.
> >
> > I think it's safe to remove the parts of gconf in sugar-toolkit-gtk3. I
> > couldn't find any code that still uses it.
> >
> > Emil Dudev
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com<javascript:_e({},
> 'cvml', 'dwnarvaez at gmail.com');>
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> To summarize what is left here:
> >>
> >> * Port activities to use sugar3.profile and gsettings. Maybe we just
> need
> >> to document this and let activity authors deal with it.
> >> * Make sure we deal with schemas translations correctly. It might just
> >> work with Fedora 20, or it might need little tweak.
> >> * Remove the remaining bits of GConf usage in the sugar shell. They was
> >> not easy to get rid of because they use dynamic keys. Just a couple of
> >> places but migration will not be trivial. When that's done we can also
> drop
> >> the gconf schemas.
> >> * Remove the remaining bits of GConf in sugar-toolkit-gtk3.
> >> * Write a feature page for future documentation. I think Emil has it
> done
> >> as an md file, he was trying to get access to the wiki.
> >> * Figure out what to do with activity-specific and plugins-specific
> >> settings.
> >>
> >> (Not sure which of these are part of the current GCI task really, I'll
> >> let Walter deal with that :P).
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel Narvaez
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131230/386a27a9/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:23:38 -0500
> From: "Dr. Gerald Ardito" <gerald.ardito at gmail.com>
> To: Luke Faraone <luke at sugarlabs.org>
> Cc: iaep <iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org>, Sugar-dev Devel
> <sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs Oversight Board 2014
> Message-ID:
> <
> CANur9P6pjAGnKoRj07zKFwCcKg1Qmr2ofGVy0av+f0Eb00DdGQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Thanks Luke.
> On Dec 29, 2013 3:36 PM, "Luke Faraone" <luke at sugarlabs.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Since we only had three candidates for three slots, the three candidates
> > will assume their roles on the board. That is,
> >
> > * Chris Leonard (cjl) 2013 Candidate Statement
> > <http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Cjl/Candidate_Statement>
> > * Walter Bender 2013 Candidate Statement
> > <
> >
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Walter#Regarding_the_Sugar_Labs_Oversight_Board
> > >
> > * Jose Miguel Garcia (Jmgarcia) 2013 Candidate Statement
> > <http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Jmgarcia>
> >
> >
> > are members of the Sugar Labs Oversight Board effective 1 January, 2014.
> >
> > --
> >
> > __
> > (_ Luke Faraone, Web Infrastructure
> > __)ugarLabs.org
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131230/8c23de4f/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 12:57:24 -0200
> From: Gonzalo Odiard <gonzalo at laptop.org>
> To: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>
> Cc: Sugar-dev Devel <sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release XO Help-17.1
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAJ+iPVRVhiUNV4RHAUYb67d4+tSM8nGan4-AuHknz4r87sc64A at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Sure.
>
> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/Help/Help-17.1.tar.bz2
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Can we have a tar file release?
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Sugar Labs Activities
> > <activities at sugarlabs.org> wrote:
> > > Activity Homepage:
> > > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4051
> > >
> > > Sugar Platform:
> > > 0.96 - 0.100
> > >
> > > Download Now:
> > > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28860/help-17.1.xo
> > >
> > > Release notes:
> > > Add information to json file for new activity pages, Sugar views and
> > Journal
> > >
> > >
> > > Sugar Labs Activities
> > > http://activities.sugarlabs.org
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131230/dd1bd7b6/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
> End of Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 62, Issue 86
> *******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131231/6bdc4cdd/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list