[Sugar-devel] Gambiarra game
Daniel Narvaez
dwnarvaez at gmail.com
Tue Dec 24 15:57:17 EST 2013
(Assuming the policy is not obsolete or something, I think we should move
it to developer.sugarlabs.org).
On 24 December 2013 21:51, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
> By the way, we seem to have a non responsive maintainer policy already.
>
>
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Team/Policy_for_nonresponsive_maintainers
>
> Any reason we are not following it?
>
>
> On 24 December 2013 21:49, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 24 December 2013 15:10, Aleksey Lim <alsroot at sugarlabs.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 08:49:02AM -0500, Walter Bender wrote:
>>> > IMHO, the git rep is less the issue than the ownership on ASLO. git is
>>> > set up for forks, ASLO less obvious. I can give Alan joint ownership
>>> > on ASLO. (The versions available from Luiz will still be available
>>> > even after Alan uploads new ones.)
>>>
>>> I don't see how ASLO is critically different in comparison with git.sl.o
>>> in this case (passing ownership).
>>
>>
>> ASLO is more similar to a distribution than to gitorious repositories and
>> distributions usually have non-responsive maintainer policies
>>
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>>
>>
>> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/beyond-pkging.html#mia-qa
>>
>>
>>> At the end, the important thing is that
>>> both versions should be available for users (the original version, and
>>> the one which was improved by new developers). It is hardly possible to
>>> have only one download entity [on ASLO].
>>>
>>
>> If we have to choose, I think it's more important to make an improved
>> activity available then old versions provided by the original maintainer.
>>
>>
>>> In any case, that might be a topic for SN (as an ASLO's superset)
>>> to handle this kind of issues in the future.
>>>
>>
>> We can reevaluate when SN takes over, but given the current
>> infrastructure I think giving Alan joint ownership is the most pragmatic
>> approach.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
>
--
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131224/b7627fc9/attachment.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list