[Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

Daniel Narvaez dwnarvaez at gmail.com
Tue Dec 10 16:50:38 EST 2013


After I rebooted, it failed two times on the x86_64 slave and it succeeded
two times on i386. Probably worth to keep a look on the difference between
the two slaves because x86_64 seems to have failed a lot more than i386.

After I cleaned disk, it always succeeded so far.

Let's see when/how it fails again, I guess. But let me know if you want
access to the slaves.


On 10 December 2013 21:54, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 10 December 2013 20:47, Code Raguet <iraguet at activitycentral.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello, list!
>> quick-master is failing in almost every build since last Sunday (Dec 8).
>> I'd like to fix this and get back to green.
>>
>> I'm not able to replay this failure locally, has anyone a failing local
>> env?
>>
>
> Not me :/
>
>
>> full-master has been running successfully (3 times) since quick-master is
>> broken, so, I wonder:
>>
>> - might this issue be a quick-master specific environment issue?
>>   - perhaps a dirty build artifact or remains?
>>   - is possible to force an "$ ./osbuild clean" on quick-master?
>>
>
> I'm going to first reboot and test. Then clean disk artifacts and test.
> I'll let you know how it goes.
>
>
>>
>> Another approach:
>> quick-master is failing within sugar-web module, the test that reports
>> failure is not new and suga-web hasn't changed since quick-master started
>> to fail, therefore:
>>
>> - have been changes in  sugar-web/python contract? (this is a
>> possibility, but it feels like an envirinmental issue, IMHO)
>>
>
> I suspect it's an environmental issue. It started to fail more or less
> randomly since I reinstalled the slaves... I don't think I have changed
> anything in the OS, maybe I had increased memory on the old slaves, but 1
> GB seems like it should be enough (or we have a problem I guess :P).
>
> Would you like to have access to the slaves so you can play? I'm a bit
> swamped these days and I've been trying to look into it but never really
> found enough time yet :/
>



-- 
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131210/473a8dc3/attachment.html>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list