[Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

Daniel Narvaez dwnarvaez at gmail.com
Wed Dec 4 14:16:37 EST 2013


On 4 December 2013 20:06, Rogelio Mita <rogeliomita at activitycentral.com>wrote:

>
> 2013/12/4 Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>
>
>> This is a good concrete example of what worries me. Assuming the custom
>> protocol is a slightly better solution (it might not be, it's a bit hard to
>> evaluate but... for the sake of this dicussion let's assume it is), what do
>> we do?
>
>
> *I think in a loud voice and I mean...* If it is feasible (web-server for
> both), I'm a bit extreme but... I prefer to have a single protocol for both
> or have no support at all, thinking something in the middle it is not a
> good idea =S
>
>
I see your point of course. Though if we can keep the webkit2
implementation the best it can be and, at the same time, allow people like
Gonzalo to provide rudimentary support for web activities in deployed/ing
software, maybe it's a good compromise... (Thinking out loud too).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131204/34954f4a/attachment.html>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list