[Sugar-devel] Are we ready for code freeze?

[Thomas Gilliard]

On 08/29/2013 06:01 AM, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
> On 08/29/2013 05:35 AM, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
>> On 08/28/2013 11:03 AM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>>> I agree in the need of testing.
>>> Testing is more difficult this cycle because:
>>> * We have less developers working.
>>> * We don't have the images we usually used to test on our main 
>>> hardware platform (XO*) yet.
>>> I don't know if any test is done now on Fedora 20 Sugar spin,
>> Soas F20 Alpha TC1 live x86_64 starts as a gnome desktop with only 
>> e-toys and a utility group of apps. There is no sugar.
>> yum install @sugar-desktop does not install sugar.  This has been the 
>> case for a while in nightly composes also.
>>
>> TC2 is just out and I am looking at it.
>
> Same for f20 Alpha TC2:
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:Soas-Alpha-TC2-x86_64.png

I just did "yum install lightdm" in {alt} {f2} root console of installed 
F20_Alpha_TC-2-Soas and sugar starts after restart:

(I remembered we used lightdm in f19 Soas)

http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:F20_Alpha_TC-2-SoaS_with_lightdm_.png

Tom Gilliard
>>
>> Tom Gilliard
>>> but according to Peter Robinson mail, not too much communication 
>>> from that part.
>>> From my part, I am building rpms for Australia, to use sugar 0.100 
>>> on a F18 image.
>>> We will do testing on that, but not in the web part, at least not 
>>> now, due to missing dependencies.
>>>
>>> Gonzalo
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:dwnarvaez at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     On 28 August 2013 19:33, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com
>>>     <mailto:walter.bender at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>         To me the issue is that we have no sense of the urgency of
>>>         the 250
>>>         bugs that have not been triaged. Most of the bugs that have been
>>>         triaged are not urgent and should not hold up the release.
>>>         (They can
>>>         be tagged for 102 with little consequence.) But the great
>>>         unknown is
>>>         what scares me.
>>>
>>>
>>>     There are those and there are the N bugs which has not been
>>>     discovered because people are not testing... We can block
>>>     rescheduling on completing the triage but can we block on
>>>     someone doing the testing? This is totally a subjective feeling
>>>     but my impression is that the worst bugs are unreported.
>>>
>>>     I was hoping to go towards continuous development gradually
>>>     after 0.100 but now I sort of feel forced into it because there
>>>     are too many unknowns to put down a schedule.
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Sugar-devel mailing list
>>>     Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>     <mailto:Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
>>>     http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130829/f2c94fe8/attachment-0001.html>