[Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 58, Issue 47
Tony Anderson
tony_anderson at usa.net
Sat Aug 24 03:21:04 EDT 2013
Hi, Jerry
I think the difference in approach is that you have a centralized
organization supporting widely distributed deployments. In that case
providing an image with the necessary customizations is probably much
easier.
For those of us supporting a stack of XOs in a room, it is very simple
to run a post-install (post-flash?) script. It adds a few minutes per XO
since the flash has to be done by usb key anyway. This also avoids the
'locked' XO problem.
I had the experience in Rwanda of attempting to do a local OS build. The
first step was to download about 10GB of repository. Not going to happen
in the internet environment there. A deployment who wants to rebuild
must make sure that it has the repositories available on hard drives
capable of doing the build offline.
Tony
On 08/24/2013 08:34 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-08-24 at 15:13 +1100, David Leeming wrote:
>> >That's all understood. However the task at hand is that a regional bank has
>> >donated 200 XO 1.5s to two schools in the Solomons and they want to play
>> >videos and music on them. I can't say, well sorry they gave you the wrong
>> >ones.
>> >
>> >Another issue was that 2GB 1.5s were supplied with 11.3.1 and have very
>> >limited memory and the journals become full within a few days use, so we
>> >have the job now of upgrading them all with 8GB cards kindly forwarded to us
>> >by OLPC.
>> >
>> >With the extra memory we thought we'd upgrade to 13.2.0 but if we can't find
>> >a way to conveniently install codecs on them all we have the choice of
>> >staying with 11.3.1 which is still pretty good.
>> >
> To install the codecs I would strongly suggest that you explore
> os-olpc-builder and brew up what you need into an image that you can
> install on unlocked machines. That is what I do for the OLPC Australia.
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list