[Sugar-devel] How everyone can help with 0.100

[Daniel Narvaez]

On 17 August 2013 12:03, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 17 August 2013 05:21, Jerry Vonau <jvonau at shaw.ca> wrote:
>
>> Adding in olpc-devel.
>>
>> On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 03:34 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>> > This is based on the last sugar-build configuration which supported
>> > fedora 18. Note, I'm guessing a lot, you should give it a try before
>> > settling on a plan.
>> >
>> > * webkitgtk
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > which drags in
>> >
>> >
>> > libsoup
>> > glib
>> > gobject-introspection
>> > pygobject
>> > dbus-python
>> >
>>
>> Kind of need to know the exact versions of the above packages, olpc is
>> carrying patched versions[1] of a couple of those packages, so we need
>> to be careful here. Anybody want to chime in on what patches need to be
>> present for the XOs?
>>
>
> I would take versions/specs from the Fedora 19 latest updates and add the
> following patches
>
> gobject-introspection:
>
> stringfix2.patch
> str.patch
> stringfix3.patch
>
> pygobject:
>
> Consolidate-signal-connection-code.patch
> Optimize-connection-of-Python-implemented-signals.patch
> Optimize-property-get-set-when-using-GObject.props.patch
> Optimize-signal-lookup-in-gi-repository.patch
> Simplify-registration-of-custom-types.patch
>

Alternatively, use the F20 versions/specs and don't add any patch. Not sure
which is better... If the patches apply cleanly or can be trivially ported
I'd rather use the F19  versions/specs, which is what we currently have in
sugar-build too.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130817/898d1d5b/attachment.html>