[Sugar-devel] How everyone can help with 0.100 forwarded
Jerry Vonau
jvonau at shaw.ca
Sat Aug 17 00:41:42 EDT 2013
Sorry to those who receive this twice.
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 22:21 -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> Adding in olpc-devel.
>
> On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 03:34 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> > This is based on the last sugar-build configuration which supported
> > fedora 18. Note, I'm guessing a lot, you should give it a try before
> > settling on a plan.
> >
> > * webkitgtk
> >
> >
> >
> > which drags in
> >
> >
> > libsoup
> > glib
> > gobject-introspection
> > pygobject
> > dbus-python
> >
>
> Kind of need to know the exact versions of the above packages, olpc is
> carrying patched versions[1] of a couple of those packages, so we need
> to be careful here. Anybody want to chime in on what patches need to be
> present for the XOs?
I'm looking for help on which patches might be now included in the
upstream packages and are no longer need.
> * gwebsockets
>
> What are its dependencies?
>
> > * libxklavier (not needed on the XO according to Jerry).
> >
>
> See for yourself[2], olpc doesn't ship sugar-cp-keyboard.
>
Jerry
>
> 1.http://mock.laptop.org/cgit/local.13.2.0/tree/SRPMS
> 2.http://download.laptop.org/xo-4/os/official/13.2.0-13/32013o4.packages.txt
>
> >
> > The first group of dependencies are probably going to be quite a pain.
> > So you might want to patch webactivity.py to support webkit1 instead.
> >
> > That would leave only gwebsockets. Add sugar, sugar-toolkit-gtk3,
> > sugar-datastore, sugar-artwork. A total of five packages, not too bad.
> >
> >
> > On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Martin Abente wrote:
> > I think that having these packages on a publicly available
> > repo would be of great help, not only for testing but also for
> > developing... I know that maintaining specs and a building
> > system sounds like headache now... but what if we can split
> > the work?
> >
> > Daniel, how many system packages (aprox) are we talking about?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Jerry Vonau <jvonau at shaw.ca>
> > wrote:
> > OLPC doesn't ship with cp-keyboard installed perhaps
> > for testing on XOs
> > we could just patch that out at rpm generation like
> > OLPC had done in the
> > past.
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> > On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 02:17 +0200, Daniel Narvaez
> > wrote:
> > > By the way I think libxklavier 5.4 is not even in
> > Fedora 19 but it's
> > > required for the keyboard control panel section to
> > work.
> > >
> > > On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> > > >From memory gwebsockets 0.3, libxklavier
> > 5.4, webkitgtk
> > > 2.0.x. There are almost certainly more deps.
> > (We really need
> > > to start tracking our dependencies more
> > systematically but
> > > it's tricky).
> > >
> > > On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Jerry Vonau
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 10:57 +0200,
> > Daniel Narvaez
> > > wrote:
> > > > It would be nice but I think it
> > would involve a non
> > > trivial amount of
> > > > work to do it properly. It's not
> > just rebuilding the
> > > sugar rpms, there
> > > > are system dependencies that would
> > need to be
> > > built... latest
> > > > libxklavier and webkitgtk comes to
> > my mind, but
> > > there is probably
> > > > more.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > What versions of the above packages
> > and gwebsockets
> > > are required?
> > >
> > > Jerry
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On 15 August 2013 05:12, Martin
> > Abente
> > > > <martin.abente.lahaye at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > +1 This would be great!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at
> > 8:42 PM, Gonzalo
> > > Odiard
> > > > <gonzalo at laptop.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > +1 to have rpms to
> > install over
> > > 13.2.0
> > > > In this way we can
> > isolate for other
> > > changes on the
> > > > distro,
> > > > for every change
> > in Fedora version,
> > > there are broken
> > > > pieces,
> > > > we learned that...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Gonzalo
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 14,
> > 2013 at 8:48 PM,
> > > James Cameron
> > > > <quozl at laptop.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > Yes, an
> > image or a procedure
> > > for retrofit of
> > > > 13.2.0
> > please.
> > > >
> > > > I think a
> > retrofit might
> > > provide for wider
> > > > testing.
> > A set of RPMs to
> > > > download
> > and install, then
> > > reboot?
> > > >
> > > > On Wed,
> > Aug 14, 2013 at
> > > 03:28:14PM +0200,
> > > > Daniel
> > Narvaez wrote:
> > > > > Being an
> > OLPC list perhaps
> > > it's better to
> > > > wait we
> > have a XO image
> > > before
> > > > > posting
> > there?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 14
> > August 2013 15:26,
> > > Chris Leonard
> > > >
> > <cjlhomeaddress at gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list