[Sugar-devel] 0.100 status

[Peter Robinson]

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Gonzalo Odiard <gonzalo at laptop.org> wrote:
> I will have more time for testing and bug fixing
> starting next Monday and for a month.
>
> Should be good have rpms to test in the XOs,
> who will build them?

I'm happy to try an spin an F-20 image for the XOs, I likely won't do
all models but if we can come to an agreement of what's useful
spinning at least an initial image allows people to use "yum upgrade"
to keep up with the latest development. Would that work?

Peter

> Gonzalo
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> 0.99.2 is due tomorrow, and we are going freeze strings, UI and API with it.
>>
>> Sadly we didn't make any progress since 0.99.1. We haven't fixed any bug and
>> only a couple has been reported (which probably means no one is really
>> testing). I'm not sure why contributions dropped just after feature freeze.
>> Fixing bugs is probably not as fun as adding features, but it's certainly
>> required if we want to ship something we can be proud of.
>>
>> If there is anything I can do to facilitate bug fixing please let me know.
>> I've been spending quite a bit of time triaging existing tickets but,
>> honestly, there is not much point to continue with that work until people
>> actually start fixing bugs.
>>
>> Even if our release process is time based, I don't think we should release
>> 0.100 until quality is decent. From the little testing I've doing that will
>> require a considerable amount of work.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Narvaez
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel