[Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Plans for SoaS v10

[samy (free)]

Hi,

Thanks for your effort.

I tried  on a usb stick [1].
At the moment, I am blocked at the login screen without clue about a
possible user/password combination. Any attempt on the console failed
too.

According to [2], the user/root password issue was open on past fedora
live images, however I don't find any usable reference to get past this
bug/feature ;-)

On a side note, I try to contribute to the Sugar localization effort
(locale FR-FR) and, I am afraid to say that those SOAS images are the
only practically usable option, considering that - at least on my Debian
machines - the jhbuild/build, Sugar deb packages, sweets and the like
options fail to be build/run for various reasons.

Thanks again for your effort to make it happen!

Regards from France

samy

[1] Fedora-20-Nightly-i686-Live-soas-20130807.10-1.iso
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967385

Le mercredi 07 août 2013 à 19:28 +0100, Peter Robinson a écrit :
> Hi All,
> 
> In the planning for v10 (wow where's 5 yearrs gone!) which will have
> sugar 0.100 or what ever it's called!
> 
> Fedora 20 is now running just fine (I've been testing a gtk3 only
> setup in a VM). There's nightly images below i686[1]and x86_64[2] as
> well as ARMv7 images [3][4]. The latest nightly x86 livecds [5] and
> ARM images [6] can be found at the links.
> 
> There are a number of of other changes I plan to make:
> * gwebsockets is packaged and the WebServices control panel at least
> displays. Do we plan/want to package any default services?
> * cSound has been rebased to 5.19.1 (I might go to v6 between now and
> release) so TamTam and friends will need to be well tested.
> * I plan to drop sugar-presence-service which will impact eToys if
> they don't convert it over before Fedora 20 beta (they've had over 3
> years and been asked repeatedly to fix it and have constantly ignored
> polite requests).
> 
> While I would like to drop gtk2 activities I don't think we'll make it
> this release cycle but I would love someone to covert Record to
> gtk3/gstreamer1 because it's one of the few Activities we ship that
> depends on gstreamer 0.10 and the support for that is waning.
> 
> On another note I'm somewhat annoyed with people that don't bother to
> test the images prior to release yet tell me how important they are
> and that the SoaS pages are the most visited in the wiki so I'll be
> watching this cycle and if there's no interest in the lead up to
> release (release cycle here [7]) Soas v10 might just be the last.
> 
> Peter
> 
> [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5790715
> [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5790716
> [3] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5789749
> [4] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5789765
> [5] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?method=createLiveCD&state=all&view=flat&order=-id
> [6] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?method=createAppliance&state=all&view=flat&order=-id
> [7] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule
> _______________________________________________
> SoaS mailing list
> SoaS at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas