[Sugar-devel] Web Activity lifecycle and storage

[Daniel Narvaez]

https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/src/jarabe/model/shell.py#L42

On Monday, 5 August 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:

> Where is that?
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarvaez at gmail.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>> On 5 August 2013 17:47, Gonzalo Odiard <gonzalo at laptop.org<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'gonzalo at laptop.org');>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Manuel Quiñones <manuq at laptop.org<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'manuq at laptop.org');>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the hints Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> 2013/8/3 Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com <javascript:_e({},
>>>> 'cvml', 'dwnarvaez at gmail.com');>>:
>>>> > On 3 August 2013 02:26, Manuel Quiñones <manuq at laptop.org<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'manuq at laptop.org');>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> The problem is: how could the activity process wait for the datastore
>>>> >> write to finish?  If the WnckWindow close is called [1], the activity
>>>> >> process ends.  Unless you connect a callback to 'delete-event' [2]
>>>> and
>>>> >> handle the destroy() yourself [3] .  Which is what GTK activities do
>>>> >> to store before closing.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > The shell currently does
>>>> >
>>>> > activity.get_window().close()
>>>> >
>>>> > We could
>>>> >
>>>> > 1 Add a close method to Activity directly. That would emit a close
>>>> signal
>>>> > and call get_window().close() only if the signal didn't return True.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Activity class already have a close method, and deal with saving.
>>>
>>> Or are you talking about the web activity?
>>>
>>
>> Talking about Activity class in the shell.
>>
>
>

-- 
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130805/171dc5fa/attachment.html>