[Sugar-devel] Sugar future

[forster at ozonline.com.au]

Martin

Sorry, compatibility not transition.

Tony

> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:21:26AM +1000, forster at ozonline.com.au wrote:
> > Thanks to everybody who has contributed to the discussion so far,
> > particularly to Sean for his well researched post on Android
> > developments.
> > 
> > The choices as I understand:
> > 0) Do not have an Android transition plan
> 
> I read the SLOBS minutes of 2013-01-14 [1] as not agreeing to a
> "transition" plan but a "compatibility" plan.  This is a huge
> distinction.  If I have misunderstood, it'd be interesting to know
> where the "transition" or similar language is minuted.
> 
> The minutes indicate that no detailed plan has been agreed; there is
> no information about what technically is planned, just what technical
> directions are possible[2]
> 
> > Tony
> 
> Martin
> 
> 1. http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2013-01-14
> 2. http://www.google-melange.com/gci/work/download/google/gci2012/7972209?id=17001
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel