[Sugar-devel] New default values for compatibility in ASLO

[Daniel Narvaez]

On 9 April 2013 23:27, Gonzalo Odiard <gonzalo at laptop.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <
> alanjas at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes.. the small first :-)
>>
>> Maybe I lose the discussion: why 0.100 instead 1.00 ?
>>
>>
> The short story is we don't feel ready for 1.0.
> While can sound strange Sugar has not reached 1.0, with 2M users and years
> of development,
> we expected do a API cleanup before announce the mythical 1.0 number,
> and in this cycle, this is difficult due to resources concerns.
>

My understanding is that we didn't make that decision yet. In the release
thread we agreed to delay it until we had a better idea of the features we
are going to target. I think the marketing team should have his word on
this too.

When Simon is back we should probably bring up this again and make a call.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130410/c3d1aae8/attachment.html>